Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 598 SW2D 312 - Ex Parte Payne

Ex Parte Payne’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
October 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently October 2010 · most notably Clark v. Amoco Production Co. (1986), Lawrence v. CDB Services, Inc. (2001)

2 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

1301980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · United States v. Benz · Ex Parte Helms · Deramus v. Thornton · Ex Parte Rohleder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “available in a suit for the enforcement of a statutory legal right....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Since the contract was void, neither party was bound thereby, and thus estoppel by contract could not arise in this case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.