Bailey v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 1997
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If a person serving a sentence of imprisonment escapes from custody, the escape shall interrupt the sentence. The interruption shall continue until the person is returned to the institution from wMch he escaped or to an institution admmistered by the Department of Corrections. Time spent in actual custody prior to return under tMs subsection shall be credited against the sentence if custody rested solely on an arrest or surrender for the escape itself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“does not provide credit against the prior sentence where the defendant is indicted on a charge of escape. Here, the 72 days spent at the Metro Detention Center was the result of the indictment for second- degree escape, and thus credit for that time would be given against the sentence for conviction of second-degree escape, KRS 532.120(3), but not against the sentence being served at the time of the escape.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.