Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 598 SW2D 873 - Broussard v. State

Broussard v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 1986
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cain v. State · Bradley v. State · Barrientez v. State · Ex Parte Turner · Stephenson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““I concur in the result reached in this case. Although it does not appear from the record that counsel at the revocation hearing was the same as counsel at the trial of the aggravated robbery charge, such fact was admitted by the parties at oral argument. The requirements of Barrientez v. State, 500 S.W.2d 474 (Tex.Cr.App.1973), for the introduction of this testimony are thus satisfied.” (Emphasis supplied.) 8 See also dissenting opinion in Green .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.