Calcutt v. FDIC’s Empirical Analysis
2023
Citation profile
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1818
Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura · Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States · Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion · Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is a well-established maxim of administrative law that . . . 'if the agency has not considered all relevant factors, . . . the proper course, except in rare circumstances, is to remand to the agency for additional investigation or explanation.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.