United States v. Fredericks’s Empirical Analysis
599 F.2d 262 · 1979
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2018
7 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 113
Relies on Remmer v. United States · Mills v. Alabama · United States v. Indiviglio · United States v. Carlson · McNeely v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[R]equiring a United States Marshal to enter the jury deliberation room for purposes of displaying evidence cannot be condoned. Its use is quite possibly per se reversible error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Pickens
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.