Oldham v. Pritchett’s Empirical Analysis
599 F.2d 274 · 1979
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 14 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably United States v. Gurley (1994), Tyus v. Schoemehl (1996)
23 federal appellate · 14 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Montana v. United States · Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation · Cruz v. Hauck · 19 Cal. 2d 807 - Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving Association
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the issue was identical to one in a prior adjudication; (2) there was a final judgment on the merits; (3) the estopped party was a party or in privity with a party to the prior adjudication; and (4) the estopped party was given a full and fair opportunity to be heard on the adjudicated issue.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage“will work an injustice on the party against whom estoppel is urged.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“procedural, substantive, or evidentiary opportunities to be heard,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.