Goodbar v. Banner’s Empirical Analysis
599 F.2d 431 · 1979
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2015
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 35 U.S.C. § 141
Relies on Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass'n · United States Treasury v. Synthetic Plastics Co. · Knickerbocker Toy Co. v. Faultless Starch Co. · In re Morrell · Richard C. Loshbough v. Kenneth C. Allen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The happenstance that the ordered discovery might result in evidence bearing upon or even establishing priority does not make this issue ancillary to priority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Woods v. Tsuchiya“as the case law has developed the meaning of that term.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Woods v. Tsuchiya
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.