Souch v. Califano’s Empirical Analysis
599 F.2d 577 · 1979
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently October 2007
8 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Cohen v. Perales · Talley v. Mathews · Petry v. Califano · Taylor v. Weinberger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[W]here a claimant’s request to subpoena negative readers is denied and the disputed X-rays are not made available to him for inspection and re-reading, the Secretary may not use the X-rays as substantial evidence to deny the claim. Richardson v. Perales, [ 402 U.S. 389 , 91 S.Ct. 1420 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971)] . . and, while the use of interrogatories may to some degree be a substitute for cross examination of negative readers, . we do not think them sufficient to remedy a claimant’s inability to adequately prepare his case when denied both cross examination and access to the relevant evidence.” Souch v. Califano, 599 F.2d 577 (4th Cir. 1979).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.