Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

599 F.2d 742

Docket No. 75-4464.

Miller v. Carson

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1979-07-25

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1979

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Miller v. Carson · 370 So. 2d 10 - Carson v. Miller

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1979-07-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Donna H. Stinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richard A. Hixson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., William L. Coalson, William Lee Allen, Jacksonville, Fla., for Dept. of Legal Affairs.

William J. Sheppard, Jacksonville, Fla. (Court-appointed), for plaintiffs-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.

Before TUTTLE, WISDOM and COLEMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

We certified the following question to the Supreme Court of Florida:

¶2

WHETHER THE RULE PROPOSED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF OFFENDER REHABILITATION COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 951.23(2)(b), FLORIDA STATUTES.

¶3

The Court has answered the question in the negative. Carson v. Miller, Fla.1979, 370 So.2d 10.

¶4

We REMAND to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion of the Supreme Court of Florida and our earlier opinion in this case, Miller v. Carson, 5 Cir. 1977, 563 F.2d 741.

¶5

REMANDED.

/599/f2d/742 · .json · Public domain