Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 599 F.2d 759 - United States v. Hatfield

United States v. Hatfield’s Empirical Analysis

599 F.2d 759 · 1979

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
June 1999
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 1999

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

130197919801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brinegar v. United States · United States v. Ventresca · Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Time, Inc. v. Bon Air Hotel, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It may be that ... alternative readings of the affidavit are equally reasonable, but it is neither our nor the district court's function as reviewing courts to substitute our interpretation of the facts in the affidavit for that of the magistrate.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “United States v. Barone, 584 F.2d 118 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1115 , 99 S.Ct. 1019 , 59 L.Ed.2d 73 (1979); United States v. Swihart, 554 F.2d 264 (6th Cir. 1977); United States v. Dudek, 560 F.2d 1288 (6th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1037 , 98 S.Ct. 774 , 54 L.Ed.2d 786 (1978); United States v. Giacalone, 541 F.2d 508 (6th Cir. 1976); United States v. Rosenbarger, 536 F.2d 715 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 965 , 97 S.Ct. 2920 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1060 (1977); United States v. Sevier, 539 F.2d 599 (6th Cir. 1976); United States v. Hodge, 539 F.2d 898 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1100 , 51 L.Ed.2d 536 (1977); United States v. Moore, 452 F.2d 569 (6th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 407 U.S. 910 , 92 S.Ct. 2435 , 32 L.Ed.2d 684 (1972).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “This is not to say that probable cause can be made out by affidavits which are purely conclusory, stating only the affiant’s or informer’s belief that probable cause exists . . . Recital of some of the underlying circumstances in the affidavit is essential if the magistrate is to perform his detached function and not serve merely as a rubber stamp for the police.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.