United States v. Scroggins’s Empirical Analysis
599 F.3d 433 · 2010
Citation profile
75 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 2461 (Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990)
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Olano · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Leon · Payton v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 301 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A party that asserts an argument on appeal, but fails to adequately brief it, is deemed to have waived it.”
16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“should be upheld 'if there is any reasonable view of the evidence to support it.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Under the plain error standard, we make three initial determinations: (1) whether the district court committed error; (2) whether the error is clear and obvious; and (3) whether the error affects substantial rights. If these conditions are met, we have discretion to reverse the district court if the error seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.