Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 599 F.3d 560 - Juarez v. Holder

Juarez v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis

599 F.3d 560 · 2010

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
August 2024
most recently cited

21 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1103 (§ 103 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Janet Reno, Attorney General v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee et al. · LOZADA · Kucana v. Holder · Capric v. Ashcroft · Niam v. Ashcroft

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Failure to file necessary documentation and comply with the requirements to provide biometrics 1 and other biographical information in conformity with the applicable regulations, the instructions to the applications, the biometrics notice, and instructions provided by DHS, within the time allowed by the immigration judge’s order, constitutes abandonment of the application and the immigration judge may enter an appropriate order dismissing the application unless the applicant demonstrates that such failure was the result of good cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he decision when to initiate removal proceedings is committed to the discretion of immigration authorities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.