Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 599 F.3d 574 - Rosin v. Monken

Rosin v. Monken’s Empirical Analysis

599 F.3d 574 · 2010

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
5
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. Salerno · Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp. · Kansas v. Hendricks · Smith v. Doe · Bigelow v. Virginia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Illinois's recognition of the New York order does not carry with it an obligation that Illinois enforce that order in the manner which [New York] apparently prescribes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[California] has no authority to dictate to [Nevada] the manner in which it can best protect its citizenry from those convicted of sex offenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the Full Faith and Credit Clause cannot be used by one state to interfere impermissibly with the exclusive affairs of another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.