Nadeem v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
599 F.3d 869 · 2010
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Mei Chai Ye v. United States Department of Justice · Anim v. Mukasey · Eta-Ndu v. Gonzales · Vladimir Ismailov v. Janet Reno Attorney General US Department of Justice
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“by establishing past persecution or the likelihood of future threats to his or her life or freedom based on race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Degbe v. Sessions“To qualify for withholding of removal, an applicant must show a clear probability of persecution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Degbe v. Sessions“legal determinations de novo, and factual findings for substantial evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lesum v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.