Jeffredo v. Macarro’s Empirical Analysis
599 F.3d 913 · 2009
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 1303 (§ 203 of the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968) · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2242 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Trop v. Dulles · Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez · Jones v. Cunningham · Cities of Charlottesville v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. · Klapprott v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“That the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over [the plaintiff's] complaint does not preclude it from imposing Rule 11 sanctions for filing a frivolous complaint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Scudero v. Moran“A tribe's right to define its own membership for tribal purposes has long been recognized as central to its existence as an independent political community.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.