Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

599 F. App'x 68

Suggs v. Purdue

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided April 1, 2015

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2015-04-01

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2015

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2015-04-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Ricardo M. Suggs, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Suggs v. Purdue, No. 1:14-cv-00021-IMK-RWT, 2014 WL 5092466 (N.D.W.Va. Oct. 9, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

/599/fappx/68 · .json · Public domain