599 F. Supp. 2d 1 - Hall v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
13 district ·
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 223 · 42 U.S.C. § 1395 (§ 1801 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395A (§ 1802 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395O (§ 1836 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 402 (§ 202 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 426 (§ 226 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family Physicians · CityFed Financial Corp. v. Office of Thrift Supervision · Mova Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Shalala · Cobell v. Norton · 38 F. Supp. 2d 114 - American Bankers Ass'n v. National Credit Union Administration
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] preliminary injunction is an extraordinary and drastic remedy, one that should not be granted unless the movant, by a clear showing, carries the burden of persuasion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Chapman v. Heath“The same standard applies to both temporary restraining orders and to preliminary injunctions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Chapman v. Heath
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.