Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 599 NW2D 693 - Richardson v. Commodore, Inc.

Richardson v. Commodore, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2016

11 state decisions

80199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Knapp v. Simmons · Goodell v. Humboldt County · General Car & Truck Leasing System, Inc. v. Lane & Waterman · Sheets v. Ritt, Ritt & Ritt, Inc. · Mundy v. Warren

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A possessor of land is subject to liability for physical harm caused to his invitees by a condition on the land if, but only if, he (a) knows or by the exercise of reasonable care would discover the condition, and should realize that it involves an unreasonable risk of harm to such invitees, and (b) should expect that they will not discover or realize the danger, or will fail to protect themselves against it, and (c) fails to exercise reasonable care to protect them against the danger.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Although a plurality of the court would abrogate any distinction based on the status of the plaintiff, see Sheets v. Ritt, Ritt & Ritt, Inc., 581 N.W.2d 602, 603 (Iowa 1998), that position has not yet gained the approval of a majority of this court. Therefore,. the status of the plaintiff continues to be a relevant consideration in premises liability law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.