Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 599 Pa. 656 - Commonwealth v. Snyder

Commonwealth v. Snyder’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

36 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · California v. Trombetta · Arizona v. Youngblood · United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the Commonwealth appeals a suppression order, we consider only the evidence from [Appellee’s] witnesses together with the portion, of the Commonwealth’s evidence which is uncontrovert-ed. Our standard of review is limited to determining whether the suppression court’s factual findings are supported by the record, but we exercise de novo-re-view over the suppression court’s conclusions of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.