Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 599 So. 2d 1230 - Hays v. State

599 So. 2d 1230 - Hays v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
October 1998
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Pulley v. Harris · Lisenba v. People of State of California · Jones v. Howard · Hitchcock v. Dugger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In order to grant a motion for a new trial alleging perjured testimony, the trial court must be reasonably well satisfied 1) that testimony given by a witness at trial was false; 2) that there is a significant chance that had the jury heard the truth, it would have reached a different result; and 3) that the movant is not relying on evidence of which he was aware at trial and which he consciously decided not to use to challenge the testimony of the perjured witness."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`[a] judgment of acquittal "is not required because the government's case includes testimony by `an array of scoundrels, liars and brigands'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[p]remeditation and deliberation may be formed while the killer is pressing the trigger that fired the fatal shot.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.