599 So. 2d 1365 - Perrin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2012
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 576 So. 2d 281 - State v. Williams · 547 So. 2d 613 - State v. Smith · 577 So. 2d 939 - State v. McCloud · 564 So. 2d 1169 - Barber v. State · 560 So. 2d 1231 - Davis v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(4)(b) The intent of the Legislature is to convict and sentence for each criminal offense committed in the course of one criminal episode or transaction and not to allow the principle of lenity as set forth in subsection (1) to determine legislative intent. Exceptions to this rule of construction are: 3. Offenses which are lesser offenses the statutory elements of which are subsumed by the greater offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[b]ecause Perrin did not raise this [double jeopardy] argument before the trial court, it has been waived as to the multiple convictions, but the legality of the multiple sentences can be raised for the first time on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Austin v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.