Stevens v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2017
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 528 So. 2d 1179 - In RE RULE 3.160 (A), FLA. R. OF CR. PROC. · Chatman v. State · 384 So. 2d 328 - Jess v. State · 391 So. 2d 754 - Shaw v. State · 365 So. 2d 1053 - Gardner v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“deviation be the product of a knowing and willful act by the probationer.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Under the circumstances, the court could well determine, as it obviously did, that even the most technical violation of the terms of [community control] would justify its revocation.... It is required, however, that any such deviation be the product of a knowing and willful act by the probationer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Riddle v. State“[h]owever inept and negligent his conduct, the record does not support the conclusion that Stevens willfully or deliberately missed the meeting.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.