State v. Hand’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 2002
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 412 So. 2d 507 - State v. Humphrey · 438 So. 2d 1091 - State v. Johnson · 584 So. 2d 282 - State v. Ondek · 586 So. 2d 539 - State v. Nugent · 584 So. 2d 318 - State v. Moran
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Accordingly, due deference will be accorded to this court’s pretrial decision finding no error in the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress, and therefore, defendant’s repetitive claim will not be reconsidered. This is especially true in light of the fact that there is no trial record to support a suggestion that this court’s prior ruling was patently erroneous. There is no new evidence to cast doubt on the determination made by the trial court, this court, or the Louisiana Supreme Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.