Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 1999
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Brown v. Ohio · Kolender v. Lawson · Grady v. Corbin · 590 So. 2d 918 - Ex Parte Holton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘[i]t is familiar law in the interpretation of statutes, constitutional amendments and other writings, that the intent of such writing is the substance, and the verbiage is mere form, and courts are at liberty in ascertaining the intent to hold that the disjunctive conjunction “or” and the conjunctive conjunction “and,” sometimes carelessly used, are interchangeable, to discover the intent of the writing.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. C. J. v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.