599 So. 2d 79 - Glover v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

9 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"[T]here is evidence that the appellant waived the 180-day limitation by failing to object to the continuances. "`[W]e find that appellant waived the 180-day limitation. In Gillard v. State , 486 So.2d 1323 , 1327 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986), we find the following: "We are inclined toward the majority view that the rights afforded a prisoner under the agreement do not rise to *Page 1254 the level of constitutionally guaranteed rights and can be waived." See also Toro v. State , 479 So.2d 298 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App. 1985); Pethtel v. State , 427 N.E.2d 891 (Ind.App. 1981). Cf. Tombrello v. State , 484 So.2d 1190 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985) (wherein the court held that the appellant, by pleading guilty, waived the nonjurisdictional defect of a violation of the Act); Davis v. State , 469 So.2d 1348 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985) (same). "`As noted above, on January 5, 1987, the court set appellant's trial for the March 16, 1987, term of court, and on February 10, 1987, the court set appellant's trial for the "next criminal jury docket," a known and ascertainable date. Appellant had different counsel on these two occasions. Significantly, we can only conclude from the record that both attorneys neither objected to the trial date at the time it was set nor objected during the days remaining under the 180-day time limit. If either had done so, the trial court could have set an appropriate trial date or granted a "necessary or reasonable continuance." Instead of putting the court on notice, appellant waited until the ”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Craig v. State · State v. Hill

2. “`THE COURT: I will appoint you to represent him on the appeal. File with the court reporter those papers pertaining to the unlawful detainer.' R. 24-25.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 920 So. 2d 584 - Mullins v. State · 890 So. 2d 214 - Lewis v. State

3. “Saffold [ v. State ], 521 So.2d [1368,] 1372 [(Ala.Crim.App. 1987)].”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Craig v. State