Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 599 SO2D 850 - State ex rel. CH

State ex rel. CH’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 1995
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · Arceneaux v. Domingue · Dunn v. Ina/Aetna Insurance Co. · 397 So. 2d 469 - State, in Interest of Sapia · 567 So. 2d 1139 - Hines v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The grounds set forth in the petition must meet all of the conditions of any one of the following Paragraphs: ⅜ ⅜ ⅜ ‡ ⅜ ⅜ (5) Prior adjudication as a child in need of care and removal from the parental home (a) One year has elapsed since a child was removed from the parent’s custody pursuant to a court order in a child in need of care proceeding and placed either in the custody of an agency or individual. (b) The parent is now unfit to retain parental control, and there is no reasonable expectation of his reformation in the foreseeable future. (c) The department has made every reasonable effort to reunite the child with his parents to no avail but now recommends that reunification would not be in the best interests of the child.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"[A] parent: (a) Who has abused a child by inflicting physical or mental injury which causes severe deterioration to the child, or who has sexually abused, exploited, or overworked a child to such an extent that his or her health or moral or emotional well-being is endangered. (b) Who has consistently refused to provide reasonably necessary food, clothing, appropriate shelter, or treatment either by medical care or other health services in accordance with the tenets of a well-recognized religious method of healing with a reasonable proven record of success. Financial inability alone shall not constitute grounds for termination of parental rights. (c) Whose medical or emotional illness, mental deficiency, behavior or conduct disorder, severe physical disability, substance abuse, or chemical dependency makes the parent unable or unwilling to provide an adequate permanent home for the child at the present time or in the reasonably near future based upon expert opinion or based upon an established pattern of behavior."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.