Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 599 So. 2d 951 - Ormond v. State

599 So. 2d 951 - Ormond v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
2
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

93 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably 660 So. 2d 1228 - Davis v. State (1995), Gray v. State (1998)

93 state decisions

470199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Wade · Bell v. Wolfish · Schmerber v. State of California · Turner v. Safley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “discovered since the trial, that it could not have been discovered before the trial by the exercise of due diligence, that it is material to the issue, and that it is not merely cumulative, or impeaching”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. Scott v. State · Ellis v. State
  2. “whether the natural and probable effect of the improper argument is to create unjust prejudice against the accused so as to result in a decision influenced by the prejudice so created.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. Berry v. State · Banks v. State
  3. “[takes] the evidence in the light most favorable to the accused and consider[s] all reasonable favorable inferences which may be drawn in favor of the accused from the evidence.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. 761 So. 2d 900 - Avera v. State · 772 So. 2d 1010 - Adams v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.