Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 599 SW2D 166 - Commonwealth v. Day

Commonwealth v. Day’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
April 2003
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2003

6 state decisions

30198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Robards v. Commonwealth · Stephens v. Commonwealth · Howe v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[U]nder RCr 6.16 the indictment could and should have been amended to include the period through July 3, 1977, the date shown by the proof and used in the instructions. However, the failure to do so did not affect Day's substantial rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.