Tutor v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2004
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“should not be used as a vehicle for promoting one procedure for a defendant to enter his plea before the jury after the indictment is read when that plea is guilty or nolo contendre and another procedure when the plea is not guilty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Matchett v. State“reach[ing] out and commend[ing] a procedure that would deprive a defendant of the right to enter his guilty plea before the jury,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Matchett v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.