Pugin v. Garland’s Empirical Analysis
2023
Citation profile
1 district · 2 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1501 (Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1503 · 18 U.S.C. § 1511 · 18 U.S.C. § 1512 · 18 U.S.C. § 1518 (§ 245 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 1519 (§ 802 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)
Relies on Taylor v. United States · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Iannelli v. United States · United States v. Lanier · United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.