¶1Orders appealed from, striking the defenses to the second cause of action, reversed, with costs to abide the event and the motions to dismiss those defenses denied. Where all the stockholders are similarly situated, laches and estoppel may properly be pleaded as a bar to the equitable relief sought in the second cause of action, even though that cause of action is brought in the right of the corporation (Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. v. Polcrass, 277 App. Div. 184, affd. 302 N. Y. 734). The defenses raise triable issues as to whether plaintiff’s failure to take steps to prevent the corporation dissolution, despite his registering a protest thereto, bars the relief sought. All concur. Settle order. Concur — Botein, P, J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Bergan, JJ.
6 A.D.2d 864
Greenfield v. Denner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 1, 1958
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1958-07-01
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 2014
2 state decisions
Relies on Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. v. Pokrass
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1958-07-01
View the full empirical analysis of this case →