Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 Ariz. App. 228 - Lawrence v. Burke

6 Ariz. App. 228 - Lawrence v. Burke’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
4
states following
September 1989
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently September 1989 · most notably Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Dingwell (1989), Restor-A-Dent Dental Laboratories, Inc. v. Certified Alloy Products, Inc. (1984)

4 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

190196719701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Comunale v. Traders & General Insurance · 43 Ill. App. 2d 184 - Sims Ex Rel. Ruark v. Illinois National Casualty Co. · Sandoval v. Chenoweth · Coconino Pulp and Paper Company v. Marvin · Phoenix Metals Corporation v. Roth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Even though State Farm breached its contract, it is not wholly without some rights. On the breach of the contract it became Burke’s duty to take reason-abe steps to mitigate the damages, (citations omitted) * * * Had Burke employed his own counsel who then sought to protect him, we would be faced with a different picture. The plaintiffs are in no position to raise the issue as to whether State Farm could re-enter the case. This right is one which is personal to the Burkes, (citations omitted) * * * “We hold that under the circumstances it was proper for State .Farm’s attorneys to seek to set aside the judgment against the Burkes and to seek to sustain that action on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““With respect to such insurance as is afforded by this policy, the company shall: “(a) defend any suit against the insured alleging such injury, sickness, disease or destruction and seeking damages on account thereof, even if such suit is groundless, false or fraudulent * * (Emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.