6 Ariz. App. 26 - State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 1983
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Bearden · State v. Rubaka · State v. Roberts · State v. Villegas · State v. Holliday
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The verdict of the jury was taken by the court clerk in the absence of the trial judge and was, for that reason, void, en titling defendant to a new trial. * * * ” People v. Simon, 324 Mich. 450, 457 , 36 N.W.2d 734, 737 (1949). And our Court of Appeals has stated: “Although at times the above rules may prove inconvenient to the trial court judge, it is nonetheless his duty, upon undertaking to preside at a criminal trial, to remain in control of the cause until final disposition. * * * ” State v. Jones, 6 Ariz.App. 26, 28 , 429 P.2d 518, 520 (1967).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. James““The defendant in a criminal case, especially where a felony is involved has the right to have the same judge continue throughout the entire proceedings against him. ... In the few cases where a substitute judge has been permitted to enter a case after the proceedings have already begun the courts have been very cautious to note that this will only be permitted where the substitute judge becomes completely familiar with the entire case.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““After the jurors have retired to consider their verdict, if they desire to have any testimony repeated, or if they or any party request additional instructions, the court may recall them to the courtroom and order the testimony read or give appropriate additional instructions. .” (Emphasis added)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pierce
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.