Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 Ariz. App. 348 - Nace v. Nace

6 Ariz. App. 348 - Nace v. Nace’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2008
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2008

10 state decisions

4019681970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pereira v. Pereira · Estate of Neilson · Porter v. Porter · Tourette v. Tourette · Blaine v. Blaine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the absence of a clear showing that a fair salary for the husband’s efforts has been set, Arizona decisions have followed an ‘all or none’ rule, placing the earnings either all in the community, or all in the separate estate, depending upon the nature of the property, with every presumption being in favor of the community.” 6 Ariz.App. at 354 , 432 P.2d at 902 (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.