6 Ariz. App. 60 - McFadden v. Wilder’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 1997
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on City of Tucson v. Koerber · Sabin v. Rauch · 2 Ariz. App. 272 - Nichols v. Elkins · 1 Ariz. App. 386 - Ensign v. Bohn · Bowman v. Cook
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[w]hen each party to a transaction is subject to mutual conditions precedent, then these mutual conditions are concurrent conditions. 17 Am.Jur.2d, “Contracts” § 321; Restatement Contracts § 351. * * * The duty to comply with one of the concurrent conditions would not arise until there was a tender of the performance of the other condition. Williston, Contracts, 3d Ed. § 666A.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.