Currence v. Currence’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1985
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Armstrong v. Armstrong · Murphy v. Morris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"On the facts, we construe the provision as requiring the [father] to pay the college education expenses of his child until the child has successfully completed his required course of study to obtain a baccalaureate degree in his chosen field of study. The son must be diligent in his pursuit of the Baccalaureate Degree in Architecture and maintain a reasonable level of achievement.... [Citations omitted.]"”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thiele v. Thiele
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.