¶1IN assumpsit against A and B, the plaintiff offered in evidence a paper purporting to be an answer of A to a bill in chancery filed against him and B in the Clark Circuit Court. There was no proof of A’s signature to the paper, nor that it was entitled to the character given to it by the plaintiff. Held, that the evidence was inadmissible. Doughton v. Tillay et al., 4 Blackf., 433.
6 Blackf. 411
Johnson v. Prather
Decided May 15, 1843
Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1843-05-15
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1885
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1843-05-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →