In Re Washington’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 2012
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1323 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 506
Relies on In Re Iacovoni · In Re Beaver · In Re Bloom · General Finance Co. of Virginia v. Powell (In Re Powell) · In Re Tatum
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The debtors’ argument that State Bank is an ‘unsecured creditor’ which happens to possess a ‘judicial lien’ against the debtors’ real property ... appears to be without foundation. 6 B.R. at 228 , 6 B.C.D. at 1094 (footnote omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Matter of Asplund“An allowed claim of a creditor secured by a lien on property in which the estate has an interest, ... is a secured claim to the extent of the value of such creditor’s interest in the estate’s interest in such property. ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Matter of Asplund
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.