People v. Burroughs’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · 46 Cal. 2d 818 - People v. Watson · 57 Cal. 2d 450 - Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court · 14 Cal. 4th 605 - People v. Gardeley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The existence of any prior convictions [in an SVP proceeding] may be shown with documentary evidence ... including, but not limited to, preliminary hearing transcripts, trial transcripts, probation and sentencing reports, and evaluations by the [DSH].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“any statements the experts made about the contents of those records as 'the basis for their opinions' necessarily were improper under Sanchez . The experts were permitted to rely on those records, and to rely on any reports other experts such as appellant's treating personnel prepared. [Citations.] They could not testify to the contents of those reports, however.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Yates“[b]y permitting the use of presentence reports at the SVP proceeding to show the details of the crime, the Legislature necessarily endorsed the use of multiple-level-hearsay statements that do not otherwise fall within a hearsay exception .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Bocklett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.