Thompson v. Asimos’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))
Relies on 2 Cal. 4th 1254 - Bank of the West v. Superior Court · 69 Cal. 2d 33 - Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co. · 35 Cal. 3d 390 - Olson v. Cory · 51 Cal. 3d 1130 - In Re Marriage of Arceneaux · 222 Cal. App. 3d 1371 - Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]nder this deferential standard of review, findings of fact are liberally construed to support the judgment and we consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, drawing all reasonable inferences in support of the findings”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“In reviewing a judgment based upon a statement of decision following a bench trial, we review questions of law de novo.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'A judgment or order of a lower court is presumed to be correct on appeal, and all intendments and presumptions are indulged in favor of its correctness'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.