Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

6 Cal. Unrep. 878

Crooks v. Crooks

California Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1902

California Supreme Court · decided 1902-03-12

<p>APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; J. V. Coffey, Judge.</p> <p>Action by Samuel R. Crooks, guardian, against Annie T. Crooks. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Motion to dismiss appeal. Denied.</p>

Decided 1902-03-12

TEMPLE, J.

¶1It appearing that the appellant has proposed a bill of exceptions to be used on the appeal, and that said bill is not yet settled and certified, and that the failure to have such bill of exceptions settled was not caused by any laches or other fault of the appellant, the motion to dismiss is denied.

¶2We concur: Beatty, C. J.; McFarland, J.; Harrison, J.; Garoutte, J.; Van Dyke, J.

/6/calunrep/878 · .json · Public domain