Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

6 C.M.A. 20

United States v. Johnson

United States Court of Military Appeals · decided 1955-06-10

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 2007

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1955-06-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Latimer, Judge

¶1(concurring in the result) :

¶2I concur in the result.

¶3I fail to find any relevancy in that part of the Court’s opinion which discusses the inconsistencies in the testimony of certain witnesses. Assuming a contradictory witness can be disbelieved by the court-martial, that does not concern us in this instance. Here, when the testimony of record is interpreted in a light most favorable to the Government, there is no evidence to establish that this accused aided, abetted, coun-selled, commanded, or procured the commission of this offense in any way. United States v. Guest, 3 USCMA 147, 11 CMR 147.

/6/cma/20 · .json · Public domain