6 Conn. 372
Decided June 15, 1827
Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1827-06-15
Boardman obtained a judgment, in the county court, against Beckley, and having taken out execution, caused it to be levied on his personal property. Beckley then sued out a writ of error on such judgment, and had it served on the creditor and the officer holding the execution. After this, the officer collected the execution. The writ of error was duly returned to the superior court; and the judgment of the county court was reversed.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
IN ERROR · Decided 1827-06-15
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1943
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1No rule will be made upon the officer in this case. But if he had notice not to pay the money over to Boardman, and has, notwithstanding such notice, made payment, the plaintiff in error may sustain indebitalus assumpsit against him for the money. If he paid it over without notice, the plaintiff in error is without redress as against him.
¶2Motion denied.