State v. Weber’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2 district · 61 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Norse Systems, Inc. v. Tingley Systems, Inc. (1998), State v. Buhl (2016)
2 district · 61 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cantwell v. State of Connecticut · Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire · State v. Scielzo · Papa v. New Haven Federation of Teachers · Barnes v. Barnes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] motion to disqualify a judicial authority . . . shall be accompanied by an affidavit setting forth the facts relied upon to show the grounds for disqualification and a certificate of the counsel of record that the motion is made in good faith. The motion shall be filed no less than ten days before the time the case is called for trial or hearing, unless good cause is shown for failure to file within such time. Practice Book § 997, now Practice Book (1998 Rev.) § 1-23 . This provision creates a mandatory procedure to be followed by any party seeking to recuse a judge. See State v. Cook , 183 Conn. 520 , 521-23 , 441 A.2d 41 (1981). State v. Weber , 6 Conn. App. 407 , 412 , 505 A.2d 1266 , cert. denied, 199 Conn. 810 , CT Page 2767 508 A.2d 771 (1986).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“are words which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace. City of Houston v. Hill (1987), 482 U.S. 451, 461-62 , 107 S.Ct. 2502, 2509-10 , 96 L.Ed.2d 398 ; Cavazos, 455 N.E.2d at 619 . I acknowledge the words”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Robinson v. State · State v. Buhl“[Words] are not constitutionally protected per se, however, but must be viewed in the context of the circumstances during which the utterances were made”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.