6 Cow. 389
Decided October 15, 1826
New York Supreme Court · decided 1826-10-15
J. A. Collier, for the defendant, moved to change the venue in this cause, on the ground that a greater number of witnesses resided in the county to which he sought to change it, than in the county where the venue was laid. objected that the affidavit upon Which the motion was founded did not name the witnesses ; nor state that, as the defendant was advised by counsel, and believed, he could not proceed to trial without their testimony.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1893
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1826-10-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1For both reasons, the motion must be denied. Owing to the looseness of the practice in these respects, heretofore, parties have taken very great latitude in stating the number of witnesses on both sides. We think it proper to require that they should not only name their witnesses ; but we now require them to swear that, as they are advised by counsel, and believe, they cannot safely proceed to trial, without each of the witnesses named.
¶2Motion denied with costs.