Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 F.1d 136 - United States v. Rose

United States v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

6 F. 136 · 1881

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
January 1921
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1921

1 federal appellate ·

1018811890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when, from challenges or otherwise, there is not a petit jury to determine any civil or criminal cause, the marshal or his deputy shall, by order of the court in which such defect of jurors happens, return jurymen from the bystanders sufficient to .complete the panel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “including those summoned during the session of the court,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.