Donegan v. Snook’s Empirical Analysis
6 F.2d 640 · 1925
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2002
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Patterson · Puccinelli v. United States · Daugherty v. United States · Myers v. Morgan · Brinkman v. Morgan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen the judgment is on several counts in one indictment, or on several indictments consolidated into one case, there is but one record and one judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.