¶1W. A. Redding and W. B. Greeley, both of New York City, and H. H. Semmes, of Washington, D. C., for appellants.
¶2J. H. Milans and C. T. Milans, both of Washington, D. C., and Albert C. Nolte, of New York City (Edmund Quincy Moses, of New York City, on the brief), for appellee.
¶3Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.
¶5The invention here is closely related to that involved in the preceding appeal, No. 1754, just decided. — App. D. C. —, 6 F.(2d) 708. The counts of this interference were originally in the other, but-on motion of the senior party the interference was dissolved as to them, and the junior parties filed another application, in which these claims were made. Since the two cases have been submitted on a single record, the conclusion reached in the preceding appeal will be controlling here, as below, and the decision therefore is affirmed.
¶6Affirmed.