Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 F.2d 943 - In re Stoffregen

In re Stoffregen’s Empirical Analysis

6 F.2d 943 · 1925

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
April 1929
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Cameron Septic Tank Company v. City of Knoxville · Seror v. Dick · Rousseau v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That the rights of priority provided by section 4887 of the Revised Statutes, for the filing of applications for patent for inventions and designs, which rights had not expired on the 1st day of August, 1914, or which rights have arisen since the 1st day of August, 1914, shall he, and the same are hereby, extended until the expiration of a period of six months from the passage of this act in favor of the citizens of the United States ■ or citizens or subjects of all countries which have extended, or which now extend, or which within said period of six months shall extend substantially reciprocal privileges to citizens of the United States, and such extension shall apply to applications upon which patents have been granted, as well as to applications now pending or filed within the period herein.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.