Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 F.3d 108 - 1st Westco Corporation v. School District of Philadelphia

1st Westco Corporation v. School District of Philadelphia’s Empirical Analysis

6 F.3d 108 · 1993

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably Pansy v. Borough of Stroudsburg (1994), Ifeanyi Charles Anthony Okpalobi Causeway Medical Suite v. Mike Foster State of Louisiana (2001)

10 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

1601993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co. · Golden v. Zwickler · Rode v. Dellarciprete · Waldorf v. Shuta

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “General authority to enforce the laws of the state is not sufficient to make government officials the proper parties to litigation challenging the law.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Rather, it is only appropriate to allow a state official to be named in a suit based on his general duties where there is a “real, not ephemeral, likelihood or realistic potential that the connection will be employed against the plaintiffs interests.” This requirement is consistent with Young, where the Minnesota Attorney General had already commenced proceedings to enforce the challenged statute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]f we were to allow [joinder of] Commonwealth Officials in this lawsuit based on their general obligation to enforce the laws of the Commonwealth, we would quickly approach the nadir of the slippery slope; each state's high policy officials would be subject to defend every suit challenging the constitutionality of any state statute, no matter how attenuated his or her connection to it.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.